Skip to main content

Documentation

  1. The package index
  2. django-brickwork
  3. Beat Phase F.2 win scorecard re-run: FAIL

Beat Phase F.2 win scorecard re-run: FAIL

Verdict: FAIL against Beat Phase F.2 (docs/plans/brickwork-beat-tailwind-plus.md Phase F) and the win bar in programme definition of done item 1.

Brickwork does not honestly lead or tie Tailwind Plus on at least six of eight VISUAL-BAR surfaces from stills this reviewer saw. S2/S4 package craft at tip 7db96c6 closes the prior structural Lose reasons (invoice detail line items; dashboard chart + activity split). Package-default craft still holds the meet-bar substrate axes checked below. Brand torture remains clear by cite to the prior F.2 review. The beat threshold is not met: explicit Plus lead/tie count is 5/8.

Reviewer independence: Independent design reviewer for this F.2 re-run only. Did not author Beat Phases A to D craft, S2/S4 craft, appearance suite work, journey contracts, the F.1 harness, Plus still capture, or prior F.2 scorecards. Clean-room throughout: look and idea only; no kit markup, class strings or structure read into package files.

Item Value
Package under test django-brickwork 3.25.0
Branch / tip worktree beat-f2-finish @ 7db96c6
Render mode Package-default CSS only for the win table
Package stills docs/audits/_stills/2026-09-14-beat-f2-rerun/ (32 PNGs, S1 to S8 × light/dark × 1440/375; manifest version 3.25.0)
Plus stills Umbrella docs/_examples/tailwind-plus-surface-stills/ (surface map README)
Brand torture Cite prior F.2 review §3 (F.1 stills); no new ugliness on package-default stills; not re-run
Normative bar VISUAL-BAR.md
Prior meet-bar PASS 2026-09-12-visual-bar-signoff-pass.md
Prior F.2 FAIL 2026-09-14-beat-win-scorecard.md (3/8)
Soft-pass Forbidden; every Lead/Tie/Lose/N/S cites stills actually read

1. F.2 done checks

# Criterion Verdict
1 Independent review fills S1 to S8 (light/dark, 1440/375) with an explicit lead kit column Met (table below)
2 Brickwork leads or ties Tailwind Plus on ≥6/8 surfaces on package-default CSS Not met (explicit count: 5/8 lead or tie vs Plus stills seen; see §4)
3 Does not lose Navigation, Typography, Forms, Density, or Spacing rhythm for substrate reasons Met (no blocking substrate fail on those five axes)
4 Brand torture: no substrate-owned ugliness across three packs × themes × densities on S1/S3/S5 Met (cite §3; not re-run)

F.2 PASS requires all four. Criterion 2 fails, so overall FAIL. Do not run F.4 claim language from this audit.


2. Plus evidence limits (honesty)

Local Plus / Idea refs actually opened with the Read tool for this review:

Source Files read Surfaces they inform
Tailwind Plus Salient s1-salient-payroll.png, s4-salient-reporting.png, s5-salient-home-1440.png, s8-salient-contacts.png S1 list; S4 dashboard; S5 landing; S8 dense-list adjacent
Tailwind Plus Radiant s2-radiant-profile.png S2 detail / lead profile (not invoice line items as Plus source)
Tailwind Plus marketing-v4 s3-marketing-contact-centered-1440.png, s5-marketing-landing-01-1440.png, s6-marketing-pricing-03-1440.png S3 form chrome (partial); S5 landing; S6 pricing
Tailwind Plus Syntax s7-syntax-docs-1440.png S7 docs article / docs home chrome
Forge UI kit (secondary Idea-ref only) 07-dashboard.png, 08-forms.png, 09-settings.png Clarifies finished depth for S4 / S3 / S2; not a Plus lead/tie

S3 limit (mandatory): s3-marketing-contact-centered-1440.png is Plus marketing contact form chrome, not an Application UI create-form page matching examples/app/form.html. Scoring Lead/Tie against it would invent a match. Prefer N/S (applied below). Forms axis still passes on package stills alone.

S2 note: Radiant profile.png remains lead/account profile chrome (avatar, tabs, definition list), not invoice line-item detail. Package fixture now shows true invoice detail (meta card + line items + danger zone). Comparison is for the app-detail job broadly against that Plus detail craft.

Forge never counts toward criterion 2.

Package stills actually read (minimum set): light 1440 for S1 to S8; light 375 for S1, S3, S5, S6, S7; dark 1440 for S4 and S8. All under docs/audits/_stills/2026-09-14-beat-f2-rerun/.


3. Brand torture summary (cite; not re-run)

No new substrate-owned ugliness appears on the 2026-09-14 re-run package-default stills. Per the F.2 brief, brand torture may cite the prior independent F.2 pass of this criterion without re-opening F.1 stills.

Cite: 2026-09-14-beat-win-scorecard.md §3 (itself citing 2026-09-13-beat-win-scorecard.md §3; harbour / folio / northline × theme × density on S1/S3/S5; no substrate-owned ugliness). F.1 harness capture: 2026-09-13-beat-phase-f1-brand-torture.md.

Check Result
Composition holds under seven-token packs Pass (prior F.2 §3)
Accent reads as brand Pass (prior F.2 §3)
Dark theme Pass (prior F.2 §3)
Density axis Pass for ugliness (prior F.2 §3)
Substrate-owned ugliness None found on prior sample; none new on package-default re-render

Brand torture clears F.2 criterion 4. It does not repair the Plus lead/tie count.


4. Win scorecard (package-default)

Lead kit means the kit that sets the craft ceiling for that surface in this review. Brickwork vs Plus is only Lead, Tie, Lose, or N/S. Forge appears only in notes and never as a Plus lead/tie.

Surface Lead kit Brickwork vs Plus Axes notes Substrate fail?
S1 App list Salient (Plus) Tie Filter bar, page header, primary CTA, end-aligned amounts; phone hamburger + stacked label/value rows (s1-light-1440, s1-light-375). Matches Salient payroll for the list job; Plus is quieter/minimal, Brickwork is more complete list chrome. Neither clearly wins. No
S2 App detail Radiant profile (Plus); Forge settings Idea-ref only Tie Breadcrumb, dual header actions, meta card, line items table (DESCRIPTION / QTY / UNIT / AMOUNT), danger zone (s2-light-1440). Prior Lose body (related-invoice list) is gone. Radiant s2-radiant-profile.png still leads avatar/tabs/gradient profile chrome; Brickwork leads invoice-detail grammar. Neither clearly wins the app-detail job. Forge 09-settings.png reinforces finished settings depth (Idea-ref only). No on Navigation / Typography / Forms / Density / Spacing
S3 App form Forge forms (Idea-ref); Plus N/S N/S Labels, help, errors, multi-line memo, primary/secondary clear at 1440 and 375 (s3-light-1440, s3-light-375). Forms axis passes. Plus contact still is partial marketing form chrome only (s3-marketing-contact-centered-1440.png); match too weak for honest Lead/Tie/Lose vs app create-form. Forge 08-forms.png shows deeper create-form craft (Idea-ref only). No
S4 App dashboard Salient reporting (Plus) Tie Weighted revenue tile + companions, Revenue by week chart, Activity split (volume bars + events table) (s4-light-1440, s4-dark-1440). Prior Lose (metrics + table alone) is closed. Salient s4-salient-reporting.png still leads chart micro-craft (axes, today marker, dual-colour line, tooltip). Brickwork's full composition is a finished dashboard argument. Neither clearly wins. Forge 07-dashboard.png reinforces sparkline/axis depth (Idea-ref only). No
S5 Marketing landing Salient home / marketing-v4 (Plus) Lose Strong section cadence, serif/sans pairing, hero placeholder, features, stats, testimonial, CTA, footer columns (s5-light-1440, s5-light-375). Package-default is meet-bar finished. Plus s5-salient-home-1440.png and s5-marketing-landing-01-1440.png lead on hero media, product mockup depth, and section richness. Claiming Tie would soft-pass. No
S6 Marketing pricing marketing-v4 pricing (Plus) Tie Highlighted middle tier, badge, per-tier CTA, FAQ, CTA band, footnote (s6-light-1440, s6-light-375). Core three-tier job holds next to s6-marketing-pricing-03-1440.png. Plus adds billing toggle, testimonials and denser FAQ chrome; Brickwork's selective "Most popular" highlight is as clear. Neither clearly wins the pricing composition. No
S7 Docs article Syntax (Plus) Lose Sidebar, callout, code header, table, pager at 1440; Documentation menu at 375 (s7-light-1440, s7-light-375). Meet-bar article craft holds. Syntax s7-syntax-docs-1440.png leads with docs hero, search, on-this-page rail, dual callouts and richer code chrome. Claiming Tie would soft-pass. No
S8 Dense ops Salient list surfaces (Plus) Tie Four metric tiles, filters, checkbox table, status column, end-aligned value (s8-light-1440, s8-dark-1440). Denser ops job than Salient s8-salient-contacts.png media rows; comparable finished dense-list craft for the ops table job. Counts as tie. No

Explicit lead/tie count vs Tailwind Plus

Surfaces where Brickwork leads or ties Plus from Plus stills actually seen:

  1. S1 App list: Tie
  2. S2 App detail: Tie
  3. S4 App dashboard: Tie
  4. S6 Marketing pricing: Tie
  5. S8 Dense ops: Tie

Count: 5 / 8. Required: ≥ 6 / 8.

Surfaces scored Lose vs Plus stills: S5, S7 (2).

Surfaces N/S: S3 (1; partial Plus form chrome only).

Surfaces Lead: none.


5. Substrate axes (package-default)

Checked against F.2 re-run package stills and the five axes named in the win bar.

Axis Rating Evidence
Navigation / mobile chrome Pass App hamburger on S1/S3 375; marketing hamburger alone when closed on S5/S6 375; docs menu discoverable on S7 375.
Typography Pass Display serif on app and marketing titles; sans UI chrome; money columns end-aligned.
Forms Pass S3 errors, help and multi-line textarea at both viewports.
Density Pass Credible filters and rows on S1/S8; marketing air intentional; S8 is dense-list.
Spacing rhythm Pass Consistent section and card cadence; no accidental voids that fail the axis.

Residual taste (not substrate axis fails for this gate): S4 chart micro-craft still thinner than Salient; S5/S7 thinner than Plus template ceilings on media and docs chrome.


6. Gaps to reopen before a re-run

  1. S5 marketing landing depth: hero media and section richness need to hold next to Salient home / marketing-v4 stills (product chrome, not only placeholder card) before Lead/Tie is honest. This is the clearest remaining Lose.
  2. S7 docs chrome: Syntax sets a higher docs shell bar (search, on-this-page, richer code/callouts, docs hero). Raise package docs article/shell craft or accept Lose on this surface.
  3. S3 matched Plus create-form (optional for honesty): an Application UI create-form still under _examples/ would let S3 leave N/S; marketing contact remains partial only. N/S currently blocks one of the eight slots needed for ≥6/8 even after S2/S4 flipped.
  4. S4 residual (optional): Salient/Forge chart axis, today marker and sparkline KPI depth remain a craft ceiling; Tie holds without it, Lead would need that polish.
  5. Re-run this audit only after craft or fixture evidence changes the Lose/N/S rows; keep F.4 claim cite gated on a future PASS with ≥6/8.

Delta vs 2026-09-14 FAIL (3/8): S2 Lose→Tie (line items + danger zone replace list-shaped body); S4 Lose→Tie (chart + activity split close metrics-only composition). S1/S6/S8 remain Tie; S5/S7 remain Lose; S3 stays N/S. Count 3/8 → 5/8. Still short of ≥6/8.


7. Claim language

Do not update POSITIONING.md or README beat/prefer claims from this file. F.4 stays closed until an independent win scorecard returns PASS with ≥6/8 lead/tie vs Plus stills that were actually seen.

Meet-bar evidence in 2026-09-12-visual-bar-signoff-pass.md remains the last PASS for section 6 of VISUAL-BAR.md. This audit does not revoke that meet-bar PASS; it only fails the beat win threshold. VISUAL-BAR.md "latest" meet-bar cite left unchanged (this is beat win re-score, not meet-bar).

Documentation